CO129-233 - Acting Governor Cameron - 1887 [6-8] — Page 178

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

"or probable, or even a case; in any conflicting case of guilt; of which they should commit the accused to trial: If, however, from the slender nature of the evidence, the unworthiness of the witnesses, or the conclusive proof of innocence produced on the part of the accused, they feel that the charge is not sustained, and that if they sent it for trial he must be acquitted, they should discharge the accused.

And although 11 & 12 Vict. C.42 has not been extended to the Colony, still the Magistrate could not have done wrong in guiding himself by Section XX, which enacts: "Provided nevertheless, that if afterwards, from want of sufficient evidence or other cause, the Justice or Justices before whom such accused shall have been brought shall not commit him or hold him to bail for the offence with which he is charged, it shall be lawful for the Justice to discharge him."

Before being committed to Gaol, the accused was entitled to the deliberate and independent judgment of the Magistrate as to whether there was a prima facie case against him. The Magistrate was to investigate the case in the same manner as if the accused was charged with an indictable offence committed in the Colony, in which case the Magistrate should commit the accused only if a prima facie case against him had been proved, or there was probable cause for believing that the accused had committed the crime.

By acting otherwise and endeavouring to leave the decision of the case to the Governor in Council, Mr. Wodehouse has been guilty of a very grave error of judgment.

Page 173

Edit History

2026-05-25 17:24:33 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
"or probable, or even a case; in any conflicting case of guilt; of which they should commit the accused to trial: If, however, from the slender nature of the evidence, the unworthiness of the witnesses, or the conclusive proof of innocence produced on the part of the accused, they feel that the charge is not sustained, and that if they sent it for trial he must be acquitted, they should discharge the accused. And although 11 & 12 Vict. C.42 has not been extended to the Colony, still the Magistrate could not have done wrong in guiding himself by Section XX, which enacts: "Provided nevertheless, that if afterwards, from want of sufficient evidence or other cause, the Justice or Justices before whom such accused shall have been brought shall not commit him or hold him to bail for the offence with which he is charged, it shall be lawful for the Justice to discharge him." Before being committed to Gaol, the accused was entitled to the deliberate and independent judgment of the Magistrate as to whether there was a prima facie case against him. The Magistrate was to investigate the case in the same manner as if the accused was charged with an indictable offence committed in the Colony, in which case the Magistrate should commit the accused only if a prima facie case against him had been proved, or there was probable cause for believing that the accused had committed the crime. By acting otherwise and endeavouring to leave the decision of the case to the Governor in Council, Mr. Wodehouse has been guilty of a very grave error of judgment. Page 173
Baseline (Original)
" or probable, or even a con t; in any on e CAQES conflicting case of guilt; of which they should commit the accused to trial : If, however, from the slewder nature of the evidence, the unworthiness of the witresses, or the conclusive proof innocence produced on the part of the ace accuced, they feel that the crise is not sustained, and that if they sent it sent it for trial he must be acquitted, they should discharge of the accused. the And although 11×12 Vict. C.4.2 has not been extended to the Colony still the Magistrate could not have done wrong in guiding himself by Section XX which enact : "Provided nevertheless, that if afterwards, from want of sufficient evidence in that be half or other cause, the Justice or Juctices before whom such accused shall have been brought shall party not commit him or hold him to bail " for · for 173 for the offence with which he is charged, it shall be lawful for on "Iristice to discharge him." Before being 3. such committed to Gaol the accused was entitled to the deliberate and independent judgement was a of the Magistrate as to whether there prima facie against. him, the Magistrate was to investigat the Cave case in the came manner av accused was if the charged with an indictable offence committed in the Colony in which case the Magistrate should commit the accused only if a prima facie case against him had been proved, or there LVAD probable cause for believing that the accused had Committed the crime. ch acting otherwise and in rdeavouring to leave the decision of the case to the Governor in Council Mer Wodehouse has been guilty of a very grave erron has. of judgment, the horsigners his
2026-05-25 17:24:33 · Baseline
View content

" or probable, or even a con

t; in

any

on e

CAQES

conflicting case of guilt;

of which they should commit the accused to trial : If, however, from the slewder nature of the evidence, the unworthiness of the witresses, or the conclusive proof innocence produced on the part of the ace

accuced, they feel that the crise is not sustained, and that if they sent it

sent it for trial he must be acquitted, they should discharge

of

the accused.

the

And although 11×12 Vict. C.4.2 has not been extended to the Colony still the Magistrate could not have done wrong in guiding himself by

Section XX which enact : "Provided

nevertheless, that if afterwards, from want of sufficient evidence in that be half or other cause, the Justice or Juctices before whom such accused shall have been brought shall party not commit him or hold him to bail

" for

·

for

173

for the offence with which he is charged, it shall be lawful for on "Iristice to discharge him."

Before being

3.

such

committed to Gaol

the accused was entitled to the deliberate and independent judgement

was a

of the Magistrate as to whether there

prima facie against. him, the Magistrate was to investigat

the

Cave

case in the came manner av

accused

was

if the

charged with an indictable

offence committed in the Colony in which case the Magistrate should

commit the accused

only if a prima

facie case against him had been

proved,

or

there

LVAD

probable cause

for believing that the accused had

Committed the crime.

ch

acting

otherwise and in

rdeavouring to leave the decision of

the case to the Governor in Council Mer Wodehouse has been guilty of a very

grave erron

has.

of judgment, the horsigners

his

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.