"or probable, or even a case; in any conflicting case of guilt; of which they should commit the accused to trial: If, however, from the slender nature of the evidence, the unworthiness of the witnesses, or the conclusive proof of innocence produced on the part of the accused, they feel that the charge is not sustained, and that if they sent it for trial he must be acquitted, they should discharge the accused.
And although 11 & 12 Vict. C.42 has not been extended to the Colony, still the Magistrate could not have done wrong in guiding himself by Section XX, which enacts: "Provided nevertheless, that if afterwards, from want of sufficient evidence or other cause, the Justice or Justices before whom such accused shall have been brought shall not commit him or hold him to bail for the offence with which he is charged, it shall be lawful for the Justice to discharge him."
Before being committed to Gaol, the accused was entitled to the deliberate and independent judgment of the Magistrate as to whether there was a prima facie case against him. The Magistrate was to investigate the case in the same manner as if the accused was charged with an indictable offence committed in the Colony, in which case the Magistrate should commit the accused only if a prima facie case against him had been proved, or there was probable cause for believing that the accused had committed the crime.
By acting otherwise and endeavouring to leave the decision of the case to the Governor in Council, Mr. Wodehouse has been guilty of a very grave error of judgment.
Page 173
" or probable, or even a con
t; in
any
on e
CAQES
conflicting case of guilt;
of which they should commit the accused to trial : If, however, from the slewder nature of the evidence, the unworthiness of the witresses, or the conclusive proof innocence produced on the part of the ace
accuced, they feel that the crise is not sustained, and that if they sent it
sent it for trial he must be acquitted, they should discharge
of
the accused.
the
And although 11×12 Vict. C.4.2 has not been extended to the Colony still the Magistrate could not have done wrong in guiding himself by
Section XX which enact : "Provided
nevertheless, that if afterwards, from want of sufficient evidence in that be half or other cause, the Justice or Juctices before whom such accused shall have been brought shall party not commit him or hold him to bail
" for
·
for
173
for the offence with which he is charged, it shall be lawful for on "Iristice to discharge him."
Before being
3.
such
committed to Gaol
the accused was entitled to the deliberate and independent judgement
was a
of the Magistrate as to whether there
prima facie against. him, the Magistrate was to investigat
the
Cave
case in the came manner av
accused
was
if the
charged with an indictable
offence committed in the Colony in which case the Magistrate should
commit the accused
only if a prima
facie case against him had been
proved,
or
there
LVAD
probable cause
for believing that the accused had
Committed the crime.
ch
acting
otherwise and in
rdeavouring to leave the decision of
the case to the Governor in Council Mer Wodehouse has been guilty of a very
grave erron
has.
of judgment, the horsigners
his
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.